IN MODERATE TO SEVERE EARLY RA
ENBREL Functional Efficacy

Improved Physical Function Sustained Over 2 Years1

In the COMET trial, 62% of patients on ENBREL + MTX achieved a HAQ-DI score of ≤0.5 vs 44% of patients on MTX.

  • At Year 2, in the ENBREL + MTX→ENBREL group (n=108) and the MTX→ENBREL + MTX group (n=88), the percentage of patients who achieved a HAQ-DI score of ≤0.5 was 58% and 57%, respectively.1
    • In both of these groups, 8% of patients had a HAQ-DI score of ≤0.5 at baseline.
  • At Year 1, in the ENBREL + MTX group (n=256) and the MTX group (n=241), the percentage of patients achieving a HAQ-DI score of ≤0.5 was 55% and 39% (LOCF), respectively (P<0.001)1,2

Improved physical function sustained over 2 years1

Percentage of patients who achieved a HAQ-DI* score of ≤ 0.5 in the Year 2 population of the COMET Trial1

ENBREL functional efficacy
ENBREL + MTX = 1.76 ENBREL + MTX → ENBREL = 1.62
MTX = 1.65 MTX → MTX + ENBREL = 1.59

The COMET Trial was a 24-month, randomized, double-blind study of 542 patients with moderately to severely active early RA (from ≥ 3 months ≤ 2 years duration) divided into two 1-year periods.1,2

Footnotes
Expand/Collapse

*The Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) is scored on a scale of 0-3 units. A HAQ-DI score of 0 indicates the lack of any measurable degree of disability, whereas a score of 3 means that a patient is unable to perform all activities. Patients were not included in the HAQ-DI analysis unless they had at least one postbaseline value.

Study Descriptions
Expand/Collapse

The COMET Trial1-3:

Year 1

  • 24-month, randomized, double-blind, two-period trial of 542 patients with moderately to severely active RA (from ≥3 months' to ≤2 years' duration). Mean duration of disease for these patients was 9 months
  • At baseline: patients were ≥18 years of age, were MTX-naive, had a DAS 28 ≥3.2, had either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr or C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥20 mg/L, and were within ACR Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs were allowed if the dose was stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline. The doses were required to be kept constant through 24 weeks unless the patient experienced an adverse event. DMARDs other than MTX and ENBREL were not allowed

Study Design1,2:

  • The 2-year COMET trial was divided into two periods, each lasting 1 year
  • The primary objective was to compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX on clinical disease activity and radiographic change over 1 year (Period 1) in subjects with active early RA
  • Results for both 1- and 2-year analyses should be viewed in context with the populations evaluated for each time point
  • During Period 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive once-weekly ENBREL 50 mg in combination with weekly MTX (n = 274) or MTX alone (n = 268). In both the combination and monotherapy groups, initial MTX therapy dose was 7.5 mg, which was titrated to 15 mg at Week 4 if response was inadequate, and further titrated at Week 8 if patients still responded inadequately (maximum dose was 20 mg/week)
  • From Weeks 8 to 52, the mean (median) MTX therapy doses were: ENBREL + MTX = 16 mg/week (17 mg/week); MTX monotherapy = 17 mg/week (20 mg/week)

Treatment Groups1,2:

  • Subjects were randomized at the baseline visit equally to 1 of 4 groups
    • Group 1A: ENBREL + MTX in Periods 1 and 2
    • Group 1B: ENBREL + MTX in Period 1 and ENBREL alone in Period 2
    • Group 2A: MTX alone in Period 1 and ENBREL + MTX in Period 2
    • Group 2B: MTX in Periods 1 and 2
  • 131 (24.2%) subjects discontinued during Year 1 of the study: 79 (29.5%) in the MTX group and 52 (19%) in the ENBREL + MTX treatment group

1-Year Endpoints2:

  • Clinical endpoints included: DAS 28 clinical remission at Month 12, DAS 44 clinical remission, and ACR 20/50/70
  • Radiographic endpoint: change in mTSS at Month 12 (components of TSS are joint space narrowing and joint erosion scores)

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • Safety was analyzed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 542), which was defined as all enrolled subjects in the trial who received at least 1 dose of the study drug

Efficacy Analyses2:

  • The primary clinical efficacy endpoint was DAS 28 clinical remission (<2.6) at Month 12
  • For Period 1 analyses, the modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of drug and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline DAS 28 results (N = 265 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 263 for MTX alone)
  • The primary radiographic endpoint was the change in mTSS over 12 months
  • Radiographic analyses for Period 1 included only subjects with baseline and follow-up x-rays (N = 246 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 230 for MTX alone)
 

Year 2

 *One subject (Group 1B) discontinued at final Year 1 visit but received 1 dose of the study drug in Year 2 and was included in the Year 2 population.

Study Design1,2:

  • The MTX or MTX-matching placebo dose level at the end of Period 1 was the starting dose level for MTX or MTX-matching placebo in Period 2. Subjects in Group 1B (ENBREL + MTX/ENBREL) discontinued MTX by the end of the fourth week of Period 2 (ie, by the start of Month 13 of the study). In Year 2, the mean doses of MTX (mg/week) were similar between groups: 16.19 in Group 1A, 16.26 in Group 1B (mean MTX dose reported was specific to the withdrawal period [~4 weeks]), 17.83 in Group 2A, and 18.03 in Group 2B

Treatment Groups1:

  • Subjects who met inclusion criteria for Period 1 and completed Period 1 were eligible to participate in Period 2
  • No re-randomization of subjects in Year 2
  • 64 patients discontinued during Year 2: 7 in Group 1A, 16 in Group 2A, 18 in Group 1B, and 23 in Group 2B

2-Year Endpoints1:

  • Evaluate the safety of each treatment group during Year 2
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received MTX alone for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to ENBREL alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received ENBREL + MTX for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX for 2 years to MTX alone for 1 year, followed by ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity over 2 years
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity to MTX alone over 2 years

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • The ITT population (N = 411) was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Period 2

Efficacy Analyses1:

  • The mITT population was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Year 2 baseline and ≥1 post-Year 2 baseline DAS 28 results
    • For other analyses, fewer subjects may have been included if they were missing data for that particular endpoint
  • Data analyses performed upon completion of Year 2 included data generated by subjects during Year 1 of the COMET trial
  • There were 2 baselines for Year 2 analyses: the original baseline at the beginning of Year 1 and the Year 2 baseline (Week 52)
  • The radiographic ITT population received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided data at baseline, Year 1, and during Year 2
  • Nonresponder imputation (NRI) population analyses included patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-Year 1 baseline on-therapy ACR result (N = 488)

References

  1. Data on file, Pfizer Inc.
  2. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:375-382.
  3. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498-502.

The Early RA Trial and Open-label Extension Trial1-5:

  • Multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial
  • 632 MTX-naive patients with moderate to severe early RA (≤3 years' duration) were randomized to receive twice-weekly ENBREL 25 mg (n = 207), twice-weekly ENBREL 10 mg (n = 208), or MTX (n = 217). The mean duration of disease for these patients was 11 months
  • This trial became open-label and unblinded after all patients had completed 1 year of evaluation. Patients continued through 1 year of follow-up on the treatment to which they had been randomized. At end of year 2, patients switched to or continued twice-weekly ENBREL 25 mg subcutaneously
  • Subjects could re-enroll in the continuing open-label portion of the study upon meeting specific predefined re-enrollment inclusion criteria

References

  1. Enbrel® (etanercept) Prescribing Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Immunex Corporation; February 2011.
  2. Data on file, Amgen.
  3. Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1586-1593.
  4. Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Martin RW, et al. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1443-1450.
  5. Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, et al. Longterm safety, efficacy, and radiographic outcome with etanercept treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1232-1242.

Sustained Improvement in Physical Function in Patients

At 10 years in the Early RA trial, ENBREL therapy provided moderate to severe early RA patients sustained improvement in physical functioning as observed in the 2-year RCT portion of the trial, with a median HAQ-DI score of 0.5

  • Among patients completing year 10 of the ERA Trial (ENBREL 25 mg BIW), there was a 67% reduction from baseline in median HAQ-DI scores.
  • During the 2-year RCT, the control therapy (MTX) demonstrated median HAQ-DI scores of 0.6 at Year 1 (n = 199) and 0.5 at Year 2 (n = 144).1
  • The HAQ-DI is scored on a scale of 0 to 3 units. A HAQ-DI score of 0 indicates the lack of any measurable degree of disability, whereas a score of 3 means that a patient is unable to perform all activities.
  • HAQ-DI score ≤0.5 is consistent with the score of the general population3

See ENBREL's effectiveness in halting radiographic progression

Study Descriptions
Expand/Collapse

The Early RA Trial and Open-label Extension Trial1-5:

  • Multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 trial
  • 632 MTX-naive patients with moderate to severe early RA (≤3 years' duration) were randomized to receive twice-weekly ENBREL 25 mg (n = 207), twice-weekly ENBREL 10 mg (n = 208), or MTX (n = 217). The mean duration of disease for these patients was 11 months
  • This trial became open-label and unblinded after all patients had completed 1 year of evaluation. Patients continued through 1 year of follow-up on the treatment to which they had been randomized. At end of year 2, patients switched to or continued twice-weekly ENBREL 25 mg subcutaneously
  • Subjects could re-enroll in the continuing open-label portion of the study upon meeting specific predefined re-enrollment inclusion criteria

References

  1. Enbrel® (etanercept) Prescribing Information. Thousand Oaks, CA: Immunex Corporation; February 2011.
  2. Data on file, Amgen.
  3. Bathon JM, Martin RW, Fleischmann RM, et al. A comparison of etanercept and methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1586-1593.
  4. Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Martin RW, et al. Etanercept versus methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: two year radiographic and clinical outcomes. Arthritis Rheum. 2002;46:1443-1450.
  5. Genovese MC, Bathon JM, Fleischmann RM, et al. Longterm safety, efficacy, and radiographic outcome with etanercept treatment in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:1232-1242.
Important Safety Information Prescribing Information Medication Guide
Indications
 
Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Supportive Data Psoriatic Arthritis Supportive Data
Safety Information ISI

View in-depth ENBREL efficacy data from the COMET trial

Explore 3 measures of efficacy in moderate to severe RA with COMET Interactive.

Take a deeper look

Consider ENBREL “NOW” to help inhibit progression of structural damage

Watch a brief video about the interrelated processes of inflammatory disease activity and the development of structural damage.

Play Video
 
 
Close
You are leaving Enbrel.com/RheumPro
Please know that Amgen and Pfizer do not endorse and are not responsible for the content included on the site you are about to enter. Click the "Continue" button to proceed.

To return to ENBREL.com, click "Cancel" or close this window.

Privacy Policy  Terms of Use
This site is intended for US Audiences only.
©2011 Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 and Pfizer Inc
Close
E-mail this page to a colleague
Please correct the fields marked in red
Send
This content is for US health care professionals only. Amgen and Pfizer will not use your e-mail address or your colleague's e-mail address for any other purpose. To learn more about our use of your information and your rights, please consult our Privacy Policy.
Close

Send another e-mail
Return to enbrel.com/RheumPro

Close
Notice

The following information is intended for use only by residents of the United States. Countries outside of the United States may have regulatory requirements or medical practices that are different than those in the United States and may require reference to different or additional information. Therefore, this information may not be appropriate outside of the United States.

If you are a resident of the United States or one of its territories, or a health care professional practicing your profession in the United States or one of its territories, please click below.

If you are a resident of a country other than the United States, please visit the Pfizer website and the Amgen website to find information about our offices around the globe.
Close
Disease activity vs. structural progression in RA