IN MODERATE TO SEVERE EARLY RA
ENBREL Clinical Efficacy

ENBREL Achieved Rapid, Significant, and Sustained Improvement Over 2 Years1

  • The COMET Trial was a 24-month, randomized, double-blind study of 542 early (≥3 months' to ≤ 2 years' duration) moderate to severe RA patients divided into two 1-year periods1,2
  • DAS 28 clinical remission was achieved by 50% of patients in the ENBREL + MTX group (n=265) vs 28% in the MTX group (n=263) (P < 0.001)*
  • 57% of patients on ENBREL + MTX achieved ACR 70 vs 32% of patients on MTX alone at 2 years1
  • ACR 70 response was achieved by 44% in the ENBREL + MTX→ENBREL group (n = 108) and 48% in the MTX→ENBREL + MTX group (n = 88) at 2 years1
  • In clinical trials, responses (ACR 20) generally appeared within 2 weeks and nearly always occurred by 3 months3

*primary endpoint

Click each tab to review results based on the Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) or Non-Responder Imputation (NRI) analyses.

Patients treated with ENBREL + MTX achieved rapid and sustained ACR 70 clinical improvement1

ACR 70 response in the Year 2 population (LOCF)1

ENBREL Clinical Efficacy
  • At Year 1, 48% in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 256) and 28% in the MTX group (n = 243) achieved ACR 70 response (LOCF, P < 0.001)1,3

1-Year ACR 70 NRI Methodology1

12-week NRI 24-week NRI 36-week NRI 52-week NRI
ENBREL 50 mg + MTX 31%
(n=249)
40%
(n=256)
43%
(n=256)
44%
(n=256)
MTX 11%
(n=238)
19%
(n=243)
24%
(n=243)
26%
(n=243)

P < 0.001 vs MTX at these time points

2-year ACR 70 nonresponder imputation (NRI) methodology based on Year 1 baseline.1

ENBREL Clinical Efficacy
Study Descriptions
Expand/Collapse

The COMET Trial1-3:

Year 1

  • 24-month, randomized, double-blind, two-period trial of 542 patients with moderately to severely active RA (from ≥3 months' to ≤2 years' duration). Mean duration of disease for these patients was 9 months
  • At baseline: patients were ≥18 years of age, were MTX-naive, had a DAS 28 ≥3.2, had either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr or C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥20 mg/L, and were within ACR Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs were allowed if the dose was stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline. The doses were required to be kept constant through 24 weeks unless the patient experienced an adverse event. DMARDs other than MTX and ENBREL were not allowed

Study Design1,2:

  • The 2-year COMET trial was divided into two periods, each lasting 1 year
  • The primary objective was to compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX on clinical disease activity and radiographic change over 1 year (Period 1) in subjects with active early RA
  • Results for both 1- and 2-year analyses should be viewed in context with the populations evaluated for each time point
  • During Period 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive once-weekly ENBREL 50 mg in combination with weekly MTX (n = 274) or MTX alone (n = 268). In both the combination and monotherapy groups, initial MTX therapy dose was 7.5 mg, which was titrated to 15 mg at Week 4 if response was inadequate, and further titrated at Week 8 if patients still responded inadequately (maximum dose was 20 mg/week)
  • From Weeks 8 to 52, the mean (median) MTX therapy doses were: ENBREL + MTX = 16 mg/week (17 mg/week); MTX monotherapy = 17 mg/week (20 mg/week)

Treatment Groups1,2:

  • Subjects were randomized at the baseline visit equally to 1 of 4 groups
    • Group 1A: ENBREL + MTX in Periods 1 and 2
    • Group 1B: ENBREL + MTX in Period 1 and ENBREL alone in Period 2
    • Group 2A: MTX alone in Period 1 and ENBREL + MTX in Period 2
    • Group 2B: MTX in Periods 1 and 2
  • 131 (24.2%) subjects discontinued during Year 1 of the study: 79 (29.5%) in the MTX group and 52 (19%) in the ENBREL + MTX treatment group

1-Year Endpoints2:

  • Clinical endpoints included: DAS 28 clinical remission at Month 12, DAS 44 clinical remission, and ACR 20/50/70
  • Radiographic endpoint: change in mTSS at Month 12 (components of TSS are joint space narrowing and joint erosion scores)

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • Safety was analyzed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 542), which was defined as all enrolled subjects in the trial who received at least 1 dose of the study drug

Efficacy Analyses2:

  • The primary clinical efficacy endpoint was DAS 28 clinical remission (<2.6) at Month 12
  • For Period 1 analyses, the modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of drug and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline DAS 28 results (N = 265 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 263 for MTX alone)
  • The primary radiographic endpoint was the change in mTSS over 12 months
  • Radiographic analyses for Period 1 included only subjects with baseline and follow-up x-rays (N = 246 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 230 for MTX alone)
 

Year 2

 *One subject (Group 1B) discontinued at final Year 1 visit but received 1 dose of the study drug in Year 2 and was included in the Year 2 population.

Study Design1,2:

  • The MTX or MTX-matching placebo dose level at the end of Period 1 was the starting dose level for MTX or MTX-matching placebo in Period 2. Subjects in Group 1B (ENBREL + MTX/ENBREL) discontinued MTX by the end of the fourth week of Period 2 (ie, by the start of Month 13 of the study). In Year 2, the mean doses of MTX (mg/week) were similar between groups: 16.19 in Group 1A, 16.26 in Group 1B (mean MTX dose reported was specific to the withdrawal period [~4 weeks]), 17.83 in Group 2A, and 18.03 in Group 2B

Treatment Groups1:

  • Subjects who met inclusion criteria for Period 1 and completed Period 1 were eligible to participate in Period 2
  • No re-randomization of subjects in Year 2
  • 64 patients discontinued during Year 2: 7 in Group 1A, 16 in Group 2A, 18 in Group 1B, and 23 in Group 2B

2-Year Endpoints1:

  • Evaluate the safety of each treatment group during Year 2
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received MTX alone for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to ENBREL alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received ENBREL + MTX for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX for 2 years to MTX alone for 1 year, followed by ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity over 2 years
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity to MTX alone over 2 years

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • The ITT population (N = 411) was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Period 2

Efficacy Analyses1:

  • The mITT population was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Year 2 baseline and ≥1 post-Year 2 baseline DAS 28 results
    • For other analyses, fewer subjects may have been included if they were missing data for that particular endpoint
  • Data analyses performed upon completion of Year 2 included data generated by subjects during Year 1 of the COMET trial
  • There were 2 baselines for Year 2 analyses: the original baseline at the beginning of Year 1 and the Year 2 baseline (Week 52)
  • The radiographic ITT population received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided data at baseline, Year 1, and during Year 2
  • Nonresponder imputation (NRI) population analyses included patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-Year 1 baseline on-therapy ACR result (N = 488)

References

  1. Data on file, Pfizer Inc.
  2. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:375-382.
  3. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498-502.

ENBREL + MTX achieved significant rates of DAS clinical remission over time.1,2

  • The COMET trial was a 24-month, randomized, double-blind study of 542 patients with moderately to severely active early RA (from ≥ 3 months' to ≤ 2 years' disease duration) divided into two 1-year periods.1,2
  • DAS 44 clinical remission was achieved by 46% of patients in the ENBREL + MTX→ENBREL group (n = 108) and 61% in the MTX→ENBREL + MTX group (n = 88) at 2 years1

52% of patients in Year 2 population on ENBREL + MTX achieved DAS 44 clinical remission at 24 weeks1

ENBREL Clinical Efficacy

DAS clinical remission does not mean a complete absence of disease activity or drug-free remission.

Patients on ENBREL + MTX achieved significant and sustained rates of DAS 44 clinical remission§¶1

ENBREL Clinical Efficacy

DAS clinical remission does not mean a complete absence of disease activity or drug-free remission.

1-Year Data
Expand/Collapse

1-Year Data (all randomized populations)

  • DAS 44 clinical remission was achieved by 51% of patients (LOCF) in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 265) (P < 0.001, mITT)1
  • DAS 28 clinical remission was achieved by 50% of patients in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 265) vs 28% in the MTX group (n = 263) (P < 0.001, primary endpoint)1
Footnotes
Expand/Collapse

 COMET = COmbination of Methotrexate and Etanercept.

Learn about the COMET Study Design
Expand/Collapse

The COMET Trial1-3:

Year 1

  • 24-month, randomized, double-blind, two-period trial of 542 patients with moderately to severely active RA (from ≥3 months' to ≤2 years' duration). Mean duration of disease for these patients was 9 months
  • At baseline: patients were ≥18 years of age, were MTX-naive, had a DAS 28 ≥3.2, had either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr or C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥20 mg/L, and were within ACR Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs were allowed if the dose was stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline. The doses were required to be kept constant through 24 weeks unless the patient experienced an adverse event. DMARDs other than MTX and ENBREL were not allowed

Study Design1,2:

  • The 2-year COMET trial was divided into two periods, each lasting 1 year
  • The primary objective was to compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX on clinical disease activity and radiographic change over 1 year (Period 1) in subjects with active early RA
  • Results for both 1- and 2-year analyses should be viewed in context with the populations evaluated for each time point
  • During Period 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive once-weekly ENBREL 50 mg in combination with weekly MTX (n = 274) or MTX alone (n = 268). In both the combination and monotherapy groups, initial MTX therapy dose was 7.5 mg, which was titrated to 15 mg at Week 4 if response was inadequate, and further titrated at Week 8 if patients still responded inadequately (maximum dose was 20 mg/week)
  • From Weeks 8 to 52, the mean (median) MTX therapy doses were: ENBREL + MTX = 16 mg/week (17 mg/week); MTX monotherapy = 17 mg/week (20 mg/week)

Treatment Groups1,2:

  • Subjects were randomized at the baseline visit equally to 1 of 4 groups
    • Group 1A: ENBREL + MTX in Periods 1 and 2
    • Group 1B: ENBREL + MTX in Period 1 and ENBREL alone in Period 2
    • Group 2A: MTX alone in Period 1 and ENBREL + MTX in Period 2
    • Group 2B: MTX in Periods 1 and 2
  • 131 (24.2%) subjects discontinued during Year 1 of the study: 79 (29.5%) in the MTX group and 52 (19%) in the ENBREL + MTX treatment group

1-Year Endpoints2:

  • Clinical endpoints included: DAS 28 clinical remission at Month 12, DAS 44 clinical remission, and ACR 20/50/70
  • Radiographic endpoint: change in mTSS at Month 12 (components of TSS are joint space narrowing and joint erosion scores)

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • Safety was analyzed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 542), which was defined as all enrolled subjects in the trial who received at least 1 dose of the study drug

Efficacy Analyses2:

  • The primary clinical efficacy endpoint was DAS 28 clinical remission (<2.6) at Month 12
  • For Period 1 analyses, the modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of drug and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline DAS 28 results (N = 265 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 263 for MTX alone)
  • The primary radiographic endpoint was the change in mTSS over 12 months
  • Radiographic analyses for Period 1 included only subjects with baseline and follow-up x-rays (N = 246 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 230 for MTX alone)
 

Year 2

 *One subject (Group 1B) discontinued at final Year 1 visit but received 1 dose of the study drug in Year 2 and was included in the Year 2 population.

Study Design1,2:

  • The MTX or MTX-matching placebo dose level at the end of Period 1 was the starting dose level for MTX or MTX-matching placebo in Period 2. Subjects in Group 1B (ENBREL + MTX/ENBREL) discontinued MTX by the end of the fourth week of Period 2 (ie, by the start of Month 13 of the study). In Year 2, the mean doses of MTX (mg/week) were similar between groups: 16.19 in Group 1A, 16.26 in Group 1B (mean MTX dose reported was specific to the withdrawal period [~4 weeks]), 17.83 in Group 2A, and 18.03 in Group 2B

Treatment Groups1:

  • Subjects who met inclusion criteria for Period 1 and completed Period 1 were eligible to participate in Period 2
  • No re-randomization of subjects in Year 2
  • 64 patients discontinued during Year 2: 7 in Group 1A, 16 in Group 2A, 18 in Group 1B, and 23 in Group 2B

2-Year Endpoints1:

  • Evaluate the safety of each treatment group during Year 2
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received MTX alone for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to ENBREL alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received ENBREL + MTX for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX for 2 years to MTX alone for 1 year, followed by ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity over 2 years
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity to MTX alone over 2 years

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • The ITT population (N = 411) was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Period 2

Efficacy Analyses1:

  • The mITT population was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Year 2 baseline and ≥1 post-Year 2 baseline DAS 28 results
    • For other analyses, fewer subjects may have been included if they were missing data for that particular endpoint
  • Data analyses performed upon completion of Year 2 included data generated by subjects during Year 1 of the COMET trial
  • There were 2 baselines for Year 2 analyses: the original baseline at the beginning of Year 1 and the Year 2 baseline (Week 52)
  • The radiographic ITT population received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided data at baseline, Year 1, and during Year 2
  • Nonresponder imputation (NRI) population analyses included patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-Year 1 baseline on-therapy ACR result (N = 488)

References

  1. Data on file, Pfizer Inc.
  2. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:375-382.
  3. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498-502.
1-Year Data
Expand/Collapse

1-Year Data (all randomized populations)

  • DAS 44 clinical remission was achieved by 51% of patients (LOCF) in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 263) (P < 0.001, mITT)1
  • DAS 28 clinical remission was achieved by 50% of patients in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 265) vs 28% in the MTX group (n = 263) (P < 0.001, primary endpoint)1
Footnotes
Expand/Collapse

 COMET = COmbination of Methotrexate and Etanercept.

 §Disease activity score (DAS) 44 clinical remission is defined as a DAS < 1.6 units. Calculation of DAS 44 utilizes tenderness scores (Ritchie Articular Index), swollen joint count, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), and visual analog scale (VAS) from a patient's general health assessment. The DAS 44 is a validated tool used in clinical trials and serves as the basis for the EULAR response criteria. In this study, a modified DAS, DAS 28, was also utilized based on the 28-joint count (tender28 and swollen28) rather than 44 joints. DAS clinical remission is defined as DAS 28 < 2.6 units.

 The Year 2 population must have finished Year 1 and had data from at least 1 visit in Year 2.

Learn about the COMET Study Design
Expand/Collapse

The COMET Trial1-3:

Year 1

  • 24-month, randomized, double-blind, two-period trial of 542 patients with moderately to severely active RA (from ≥3 months' to ≤2 years' duration). Mean duration of disease for these patients was 9 months
  • At baseline: patients were ≥18 years of age, were MTX-naive, had a DAS 28 ≥3.2, had either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr or C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥20 mg/L, and were within ACR Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs were allowed if the dose was stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline. The doses were required to be kept constant through 24 weeks unless the patient experienced an adverse event. DMARDs other than MTX and ENBREL were not allowed

Study Design1,2:

  • The 2-year COMET trial was divided into two periods, each lasting 1 year
  • The primary objective was to compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX on clinical disease activity and radiographic change over 1 year (Period 1) in subjects with active early RA
  • Results for both 1- and 2-year analyses should be viewed in context with the populations evaluated for each time point
  • During Period 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive once-weekly ENBREL 50 mg in combination with weekly MTX (n = 274) or MTX alone (n = 268). In both the combination and monotherapy groups, initial MTX therapy dose was 7.5 mg, which was titrated to 15 mg at Week 4 if response was inadequate, and further titrated at Week 8 if patients still responded inadequately (maximum dose was 20 mg/week)
  • From Weeks 8 to 52, the mean (median) MTX therapy doses were: ENBREL + MTX = 16 mg/week (17 mg/week); MTX monotherapy = 17 mg/week (20 mg/week)

Treatment Groups1,2:

  • Subjects were randomized at the baseline visit equally to 1 of 4 groups
    • Group 1A: ENBREL + MTX in Periods 1 and 2
    • Group 1B: ENBREL + MTX in Period 1 and ENBREL alone in Period 2
    • Group 2A: MTX alone in Period 1 and ENBREL + MTX in Period 2
    • Group 2B: MTX in Periods 1 and 2
  • 131 (24.2%) subjects discontinued during Year 1 of the study: 79 (29.5%) in the MTX group and 52 (19%) in the ENBREL + MTX treatment group

1-Year Endpoints2:

  • Clinical endpoints included: DAS 28 clinical remission at Month 12, DAS 44 clinical remission, and ACR 20/50/70
  • Radiographic endpoint: change in mTSS at Month 12 (components of TSS are joint space narrowing and joint erosion scores)

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • Safety was analyzed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 542), which was defined as all enrolled subjects in the trial who received at least 1 dose of the study drug

Efficacy Analyses2:

  • The primary clinical efficacy endpoint was DAS 28 clinical remission (<2.6) at Month 12
  • For Period 1 analyses, the modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of drug and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline DAS 28 results (N = 265 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 263 for MTX alone)
  • The primary radiographic endpoint was the change in mTSS over 12 months
  • Radiographic analyses for Period 1 included only subjects with baseline and follow-up x-rays (N = 246 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 230 for MTX alone)
 

Year 2

 *One subject (Group 1B) discontinued at final Year 1 visit but received 1 dose of the study drug in Year 2 and was included in the Year 2 population.

Study Design1,2:

  • The MTX or MTX-matching placebo dose level at the end of Period 1 was the starting dose level for MTX or MTX-matching placebo in Period 2. Subjects in Group 1B (ENBREL + MTX/ENBREL) discontinued MTX by the end of the fourth week of Period 2 (ie, by the start of Month 13 of the study). In Year 2, the mean doses of MTX (mg/week) were similar between groups: 16.19 in Group 1A, 16.26 in Group 1B (mean MTX dose reported was specific to the withdrawal period [~4 weeks]), 17.83 in Group 2A, and 18.03 in Group 2B

Treatment Groups1:

  • Subjects who met inclusion criteria for Period 1 and completed Period 1 were eligible to participate in Period 2
  • No re-randomization of subjects in Year 2
  • 64 patients discontinued during Year 2: 7 in Group 1A, 16 in Group 2A, 18 in Group 1B, and 23 in Group 2B

2-Year Endpoints1:

  • Evaluate the safety of each treatment group during Year 2
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received MTX alone for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to ENBREL alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received ENBREL + MTX for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX for 2 years to MTX alone for 1 year, followed by ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity over 2 years
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity to MTX alone over 2 years

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • The ITT population (N = 411) was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Period 2

Efficacy Analyses1:

  • The mITT population was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Year 2 baseline and ≥1 post-Year 2 baseline DAS 28 results
    • For other analyses, fewer subjects may have been included if they were missing data for that particular endpoint
  • Data analyses performed upon completion of Year 2 included data generated by subjects during Year 1 of the COMET trial
  • There were 2 baselines for Year 2 analyses: the original baseline at the beginning of Year 1 and the Year 2 baseline (Week 52)
  • The radiographic ITT population received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided data at baseline, Year 1, and during Year 2
  • Nonresponder imputation (NRI) population analyses included patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-Year 1 baseline on-therapy ACR result (N = 488)

References

  1. Data on file, Pfizer Inc.
  2. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:375-382.
  3. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498-502.
In a non-prespecified analysis of moderate to severe early RA patients

Early initiation of ENBREL + methotrexate (MTX) resulted in higher rates of DAS 28 clinical remission.1,2**

DAS 28 clinical remission at week 52
Very early RA was defined as disease duration ≤ 4 months.
Early RA was defined as disease duration > 4 months to 2 years.

A non-prespecified analysis of COMET trial observed data was done to determine if very early (≤ 4 months' disease duration) compared with early (> 4 months' to 2 years' duration) treatment of moderate to severe RA was associated with a higher percentage of patients achieving DAS 28 clinical remission at 52 weeks (DAS 28 ≤ 2.6).

Important Limitations of This Analysis
The COMET trial was not prospectively designed to compare patients with very early RA to those with early RA. Data from this non-prespecified analysis should be viewed in context with the results from the prospective analysis of the COMET trial. The ability to interpret the results of non-prespecified analyses is limited. For instance, these analyses were performed following the unblinding of the data when all patient responses were known. For more information, expand the Non-Prespecified Data Analysis tab below.

**The data presented are based on a non-prespecified analysis of the COMET trial, which was conducted to identify differences in clinical response between those subjects with very early RA (≥3 months to ≤4 months) and those subjects with early RA (>4 months to <2 years) with either etanercept and methotrexate combination therapy or methotrexate monotherapy. All patients had moderate to severe disease activity. Due to this being a non-prespecified analysis, these results should be interpreted with caution. The COMET trial was not prospectively designed to compare patients with VERA to those with ERA.

Non-Prespecified Data Analysis
Expand/Collapse

Explanation of Non-Prespecified Data Analysis

The COMET trial: A very early non-prespecified analysis

  • The COMET trial was not prospectively designed to compare patients with very early RA to those with early RA. Data from the non-prespecified analysis should be viewed in context with the results from the prospective analysis of the COMET trial. The interpretation of the results of non-prespecified analyses is limited. For instance, these analyses were performed following the unblinding of the data when all patient responses were known
  • A non-prespecified analysis of COMET trial observed data was done to determine if very early (≤4 months' disease duration) compared with early (>4 months' to 2 years' duration) treatment of moderate to severe RA was associated with a higher percentage of patients achieving DAS 28 clinical remission at 52 weeks (DAS 28 ≤2.6)
  • This analysis included only patients with a DAS 28 score at 52 weeks and those who discontinued for lack of efficacy and who were assumed to be non-responders
    • Of 274 randomized to ENBREL + MTX, 220 were included in this analysis: 63 in the very early group and 157 in the early group
    • Of 268 randomized to MTX only, 197 were included in this analysis: 49 in the very early group and 148 in the early group
  • Subjects who achieved the following outcomes at Week 52 were assessed by treatment group for baseline disease duration effect
    • Clinical remission
    • LDA
    • HAQ ≤0.5
    • Radiographic nonprogression (Δ mTSS ≤0.5)
Additonal Data
Expand/Collapse

In the non-prespecified analysis:

  • ~80% of very early RA and early RA patients treated with ENBREL + MTX in COMET had no radiographic progression at Week 52 (Δ mTSS ≤0.5) and ~60% achieved a HAQ ≤0.5 at Week 521

BASELINE MEAN DAS 28 SCORES:

ENBREL + MTX Group MTX Group P-Value
Very Early RA Patients 6.61 6.71 P = 0.152
Early RA Patients 6.39 6.51 P = 0.198

In the prespecified analysis:

  • DAS 28 clinical remission at 1 year: 50% for ENBREL + MTX (n = 265) vs 28% for MTX (n = 263), P < 0.001 (primary endpoint)4
  • At Year 1, 51% (LOCF) in the ENBREL + MTX group (n = 265) and 28% (LOCF) in the MTX group (n = 263) achieved DAS 44 clinical remission (P < 0.001, modified intent to treat [mITT])1
  • In COMET, a modified DAS, DAS 28, was also utilized on the 28-joint count (tender28 and swollen28) rather than 44 joints. DAS 28 clinical remission is defined as DAS 28 <2.6 units1,5
Study Descriptions
Expand/Collapse

The COMET Trial1-3:

Year 1

  • 24-month, randomized, double-blind, two-period trial of 542 patients with moderately to severely active RA (from ≥3 months' to ≤2 years' duration). Mean duration of disease for these patients was 9 months
  • At baseline: patients were ≥18 years of age, were MTX-naive, had a DAS 28 ≥3.2, had either an erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) ≥28 mm/hr or C-reactive protein (CRP) level ≥20 mg/L, and were within ACR Functional Class I, II, or III
  • Corticosteroids (≤10 mg prednisone or equivalent) and NSAIDs were allowed if the dose was stable for at least 4 weeks prior to baseline. The doses were required to be kept constant through 24 weeks unless the patient experienced an adverse event. DMARDs other than MTX and ENBREL were not allowed

Study Design1,2:

  • The 2-year COMET trial was divided into two periods, each lasting 1 year
  • The primary objective was to compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX on clinical disease activity and radiographic change over 1 year (Period 1) in subjects with active early RA
  • Results for both 1- and 2-year analyses should be viewed in context with the populations evaluated for each time point
  • During Period 1 of the trial, patients were randomized to receive once-weekly ENBREL 50 mg in combination with weekly MTX (n = 274) or MTX alone (n = 268). In both the combination and monotherapy groups, initial MTX therapy dose was 7.5 mg, which was titrated to 15 mg at Week 4 if response was inadequate, and further titrated at Week 8 if patients still responded inadequately (maximum dose was 20 mg/week)
  • From Weeks 8 to 52, the mean (median) MTX therapy doses were: ENBREL + MTX = 16 mg/week (17 mg/week); MTX monotherapy = 17 mg/week (20 mg/week)

Treatment Groups1,2:

  • Subjects were randomized at the baseline visit equally to 1 of 4 groups
    • Group 1A: ENBREL + MTX in Periods 1 and 2
    • Group 1B: ENBREL + MTX in Period 1 and ENBREL alone in Period 2
    • Group 2A: MTX alone in Period 1 and ENBREL + MTX in Period 2
    • Group 2B: MTX in Periods 1 and 2
  • 131 (24.2%) subjects discontinued during Year 1 of the study: 79 (29.5%) in the MTX group and 52 (19%) in the ENBREL + MTX treatment group

1-Year Endpoints2:

  • Clinical endpoints included: DAS 28 clinical remission at Month 12, DAS 44 clinical remission, and ACR 20/50/70
  • Radiographic endpoint: change in mTSS at Month 12 (components of TSS are joint space narrowing and joint erosion scores)

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • Safety was analyzed using the intent-to-treat (ITT) population (N = 542), which was defined as all enrolled subjects in the trial who received at least 1 dose of the study drug

Efficacy Analyses2:

  • The primary clinical efficacy endpoint was DAS 28 clinical remission (<2.6) at Month 12
  • For Period 1 analyses, the modified ITT (mITT) population included all subjects who received at least 1 dose of drug and had baseline and ≥1 postbaseline DAS 28 results (N = 265 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 263 for MTX alone)
  • The primary radiographic endpoint was the change in mTSS over 12 months
  • Radiographic analyses for Period 1 included only subjects with baseline and follow-up x-rays (N = 246 for ENBREL + MTX, N = 230 for MTX alone)
 

Year 2

 *One subject (Group 1B) discontinued at final Year 1 visit but received 1 dose of the study drug in Year 2 and was included in the Year 2 population.

Study Design1,2:

  • The MTX or MTX-matching placebo dose level at the end of Period 1 was the starting dose level for MTX or MTX-matching placebo in Period 2. Subjects in Group 1B (ENBREL + MTX/ENBREL) discontinued MTX by the end of the fourth week of Period 2 (ie, by the start of Month 13 of the study). In Year 2, the mean doses of MTX (mg/week) were similar between groups: 16.19 in Group 1A, 16.26 in Group 1B (mean MTX dose reported was specific to the withdrawal period [~4 weeks]), 17.83 in Group 2A, and 18.03 in Group 2B

Treatment Groups1:

  • Subjects who met inclusion criteria for Period 1 and completed Period 1 were eligible to participate in Period 2
  • No re-randomization of subjects in Year 2
  • 64 patients discontinued during Year 2: 7 in Group 1A, 16 in Group 2A, 18 in Group 1B, and 23 in Group 2B

2-Year Endpoints1:

  • Evaluate the safety of each treatment group during Year 2
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to MTX alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received MTX alone for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX to ENBREL alone on radiographic change and clinical disease activity in Period 2 in subjects who first received ENBREL + MTX for 1 year
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX for 2 years to MTX alone for 1 year, followed by ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity over 2 years
  • Compare the effects of ENBREL + MTX on radiographic change and clinical disease activity to MTX alone over 2 years

Safety Analyses1,2:

  • The ITT population (N = 411) was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug during Period 2

Efficacy Analyses1:

  • The mITT population was defined as all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had Year 2 baseline and ≥1 post-Year 2 baseline DAS 28 results
    • For other analyses, fewer subjects may have been included if they were missing data for that particular endpoint
  • Data analyses performed upon completion of Year 2 included data generated by subjects during Year 1 of the COMET trial
  • There were 2 baselines for Year 2 analyses: the original baseline at the beginning of Year 1 and the Year 2 baseline (Week 52)
  • The radiographic ITT population received at least 1 dose of study drug and provided data at baseline, Year 1, and during Year 2
  • Nonresponder imputation (NRI) population analyses included patients who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 1 post-Year 1 baseline on-therapy ACR result (N = 488)

References

  1. Data on file, Pfizer Inc.
  2. Emery P, Breedveld FC, Hall S, et al. Comparison of methotrexate monotherapy with a combination of methotrexate and etanercept in active, early, moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (COMET): a randomised, double-blind, parallel treatment trial. Lancet. 2008;372:375-382.
  3. Hochberg MC, Chang RW, Dwosh I, Lindsey S, Pincus T, Wolfe F. The American College of Rheumatology 1991 revised criteria for the classification of global functional status in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:498-502.

Explanation of Non-Prespecified Data Analysis

The COMET trial: A very early non-prespecified analysis

  • The COMET trial was not prospectively designed to compare patients with very early RA to those with early RA. Data from the non-prespecified analysis should be viewed in context with the results from the prospective analysis of the COMET trial. The interpretation of the results of non-prespecified analyses is limited. For instance, these analyses were performed following the unblinding of the data when all patient responses were known
  • A non-prespecified analysis of COMET trial observed data was done to determine if very early (≤4 months' disease duration) compared with early (>4 months' to 2 years' duration) treatment of moderate to severe RA was associated with a higher percentage of patients achieving DAS 28 clinical remission at 52 weeks (DAS 28 ≤2.6)
  • This analysis included only patients with a DAS 28 score at 52 weeks and those who discontinued for lack of efficacy and who were assumed to be non-responders
    • Of 274 randomized to ENBREL + MTX, 220 were included in this analysis: 63 in the very early group and 157 in the early group
    • Of 268 randomized to MTX only, 197 were included in this analysis: 49 in the very early group and 148 in the early group
  • Subjects who achieved the following outcomes at Week 52 were assessed by treatment group for baseline disease duration effect
    • Clinical remission
    • LDA
    • HAQ ≤0.5
    • Radiographic nonprogression (Δ mTSS ≤0.5)
Important Safety Information Prescribing Information Medication Guide
Indications
 
Safety Information ISI

View in-depth ENBREL efficacy data from the COMET trial

Explore 3 measures of efficacy in moderate to severe RA with COMET Interactive.

Take a deeper look

Consider ENBREL “NOW” to help inhibit progression of structural damage

Watch a brief video about the interrelated processes of inflammatory disease activity and the development of structural damage.

Play Video

Find out more about the treatment of early moderate to severe RA based on a non-prespecified analysis of very early RA from the COMET study.

Very early RA was defined as disease duration ≤ 4 months.

See the data
 
 
Close
You are leaving Enbrel.com/RheumPro
Please know that Amgen and Pfizer do not endorse and are not responsible for the content included on the site you are about to enter. Click the "Continue" button to proceed.

To return to ENBREL.com, click "Cancel" or close this window.

Privacy Policy  Terms of Use
This site is intended for US Audiences only.
©2011 Amgen, Inc., Thousand Oaks, CA 91320 and Pfizer Inc
Close
E-mail this page to a colleague
Please correct the fields marked in red
Send
This content is for US health care professionals only. Amgen and Pfizer will not use your e-mail address or your colleague's e-mail address for any other purpose. To learn more about our use of your information and your rights, please consult our Privacy Policy.
Close

Send another e-mail
Return to enbrel.com/RheumPro

Close
Notice

The following information is intended for use only by residents of the United States. Countries outside of the United States may have regulatory requirements or medical practices that are different than those in the United States and may require reference to different or additional information. Therefore, this information may not be appropriate outside of the United States.

If you are a resident of the United States or one of its territories, or a health care professional practicing your profession in the United States or one of its territories, please click below.

If you are a resident of a country other than the United States, please visit the Pfizer website and the Amgen website to find information about our offices around the globe.
Close
Disease activity vs. structural progression in RA